I've had many people say that Paxton didn't have a chance. And a few people ran their pie-holes on this blog. And I'm not saying that Paxton is the perfect man, but he's a much better choice than Cornyn.
I said it before and I'll say it again. I will never vote for Paxton. I may not vote for Talarico either but I refuse to give my vote to a man that is as corrupt, shameless and godless as Paxton. I still believe that we should aspire to send the "best" of us to the house, senate, presidency, etc. Paxton is nowhere near close to meeting that criteria.
The true shame is that this may cost republicans the senate
So you say you will "NEVER" vote for Paxton. Then you say you "MAY" not vote for Talarico. To almost any person reading that, they now would believe you would vote for Talarico before voting for Paxton. That makes you the enemy in my book. Your opinion and beliefs mean nothing to me. And like most liberals, you are most likely going to be proven wrong about the election results.
I said it before and I'll say it again. I will never vote for Paxton. I may not vote for Talarico either but I refuse to give my vote to a man that is as corrupt, shameless and godless as Paxton.
ReplyDeleteI still believe that we should aspire to send the "best" of us to the house, senate, presidency, etc. Paxton is nowhere near close to meeting that criteria.
The true shame is that this may cost republicans the senate
So you say you will "NEVER" vote for Paxton. Then you say you "MAY" not vote for Talarico. To almost any person reading that, they now would believe you would vote for Talarico before voting for Paxton. That makes you the enemy in my book.
DeleteYour opinion and beliefs mean nothing to me.
And like most liberals, you are most likely going to be proven wrong about the election results.