HHS Secretary Kennedy Discusses Why The US Will Reject The WHO’s IHR Amendments

 

https://x.com/ElectionWiz/status/1946615595857781200

Teen Molested By Illegal Alien Who Biden Admin Sent Her To Live With

A 37-year-old illegal immigrant man was arrested for allegedly sexually abusing at least one teen girl who the federal government sent to live with him as part of the Biden administration’s scheme to place “unaccompanied alien children” in the homes of unrelated, loosely-vetted “sponsors.”
Wilson Manfredo Lopez-Carillo was arrested by the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s office in Florida on May 22 and charged with three counts of sexual assault on a minor.
Police said in charging documents that the victim arrived in the United States in August 2023 as a 16-year-old, and was placed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the home of several people, whose names are redacted but appear to include Lopez-Carillo.
The victim “reported three instances of sexual battery by [redacted] all occurring in February 2024. [Redacted] stated that [redacted] was not present during these incidents, as she would be out with her children selling tamales to support the family. She explained that [redacted] took advantage of [redacted’s] absence to abuse her,” a document said.
While she was in the kitchen, Lopez-Carillo “grabbed her, and took her to his bedroom. He removed her pants and underwear and proceeded to sexually batter her,” police wrote. A second incident unfolded similarly, with the man offering her $100 to keep quiet, which she refused, police said. She did not report the incidents to police initially “due to fear of retribution from [redacted], who had threatened her,” it continued.
The heavily redacted police statement suggested that the adult woman in the house became suspicious and confronted Lopez-Carillo. The victim was given three days to leave the house and “sought refuge with…a friend from church.” The friend contacted the woman who “revealed that [redacted] had sexually assaulted [the victim] which led to her expulsion. [The friend] expressed his shock and concern upon hearing this. He decided to allow [the victim] to stay in a room at his home to prevent her from being homeless.”
Once living with the friend, she felt safe enough to report the abuse to the police. The friend later became the girl’s legal guardian after receiving permission from her parents, and told police another girl had also sought refuge at his home after a person whose name was redacted had attempted to sexually assault her.
Police set up a recorded call where the victim asked Lopez-Carillo why he had assaulted her as a minor, and he “responded by attempting to justify his actions.” He did not deny the incidents but “tried to downplay their significance” and “attempted to shift the blame onto [redacted],” police said.
“When confronted about the possibility of a pregnancy, due to unprotected sex, he mentioned giving [the victim] a pill,” they wrote.
Lopez-Carillo is being held without bail in a Palm Beach County, Florida, jail, and a judge has determined that he is an illegal alien, according to court records.
The case was first reported by Illegal Alien Crimes on X.

There’s much, much more to the story at:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/teen-molested-by-illegal-alien-who-biden-admin-sent-her-to-live-with-police-say

I Had Never Heard Of GRAS

GRAS is “Generally Recognized As Safe” foods and chemicals.

https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1900306883459842486

‘What Is A Woman?’

Trump‘s HHS just officially answered the question. In accordance with executive orders signed by President Donald Trump, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued guidance on the reality of gender, specifically declaring that there are only two genders and defining gendered terms, like “woman.”
The guidance, issued Wednesday, specifically aligns with Trump’s Executive Order 14168, “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.”

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/

“There are only two sexes, female and male, because there are only two types of gametes,” the guidance reads. “An individual human is either female or male based on whether the person is of the sex characterized by a reproductive system with the biological function of producing eggs (ova) or sperm.”
HHS, which is headed by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., emphasizes that the “sex of a human, female or male, is determined genetically at conception (fertilization), and is observable before birth”, language that prompted praise from pro-life advocates.

Among additional gendered language, the department officially defines what a woman is. Democrats and left-wing activists in recent years have tried to promote that males can be women, causing massive disruption to female spaces, safety, and opportunities. Meanwhile, they were unwilling and unable to define the term, as highlighted throughout Matt Walsh’s groundbreaking documentary, aptly titled “What is a Woman?”
As HHS puts it, a woman is defined as “an adult human female.”
The guidance also defines sex, female, male, girl, man, boy, mother, and father, all terms that are vital in relation to science and health:

Definitions
Sex is a person’s immutable biological classification as either male or female.
Female is a person of the sex characterized by a reproductive system with the biological function of producing eggs (ova).
Male is a person of the sex characterized by a reproductive system with the biological function of producing sperm.
Woman is an adult human female.
Girl is a minor human female.
Man is an adult human male.
Boy is a minor human male.
Mother is a female parent.
Father is a male parent.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s No Mercy Policy

Profanity Alert:

 

https://x.com/drefanzor/status/1890080239092658428

I’m So Glad That RFK Jr. Is, Hopefully, Going To Be Part Of The Trump Administration

People say he’s been wrong about a few things … but he’s been right about a whole lot more than he might have been wrong about and so far, no one has been able to prove what he’s allegedly been wrong about.

RFK Jr’s confirmation vote has been delayed by the Democrats because they don't like the recent actions of the Trump administration. His vote is expected to take place next week.

https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/1856286115851907502

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Nomination For HHS Secretary Voted Out Of Senate Committee

14 Ayes Vs 13 Nays.

It will probably take a week mol to bring this to the floor for a full vote. Right now, the vote tally for confirmation is said to be 53 - 47 in favor of confirmation.

Brought To You By Pfizer And Their 15,000 Compensated Sheep

https://x.com/JDunlap1974/status/1878021061079400762

Guarandamnteed To Piss You Off

HHS Spends Vast Fortunes On DEI

Critics snigger that to rid us of extraneous departments, Trump is creating another department, which like the rest will be staffed with bureaucrats. But as entrepreneurial genius Elon Musk’s involvement attests, the return on investment will likely be massive — especially when you consider how much of our money the other departments have been spending perniciously. Take for example HHS:

The Department of Health and Human Services — with a budget surpassed only by the Pentagon — employs 294 DEI staffers at an annual cost of $38.7 MILLION.
No DEI staffer could fail to make America a better place by going away.
[The $38.7 million] doesn’t even include another $29.4 million in payroll for seven Offices of Minority Health embedded within various HHS agencies!
It also doesn’t include this:
Variations of the term “equity” appear an astonishing 829 times in the department’s 2025 budget request to Congress, impacting hundreds of millions of dollars of spending programs.
In the name of DEI, HHS has been spending vast fortunes to tear the country apart by implementing identity group favoritism.
Let’s hope Pete Hegseth puts a stop to this nonsense at the Department of Defense. With most other departments, it will probably make more sense just to burn down the whole thing.
Stand by for the media to shriek that laying off hordes of useless bureauweenies is racist due to disparate impact. This will be a result of aggressive discrimination against whites in federal hiring, as Biden made explicit with Executive Order 13985.

 

https://openthebooks.substack.com/p/diversifying-doulas-hhs-spends-hundreds

Trump Administration 47 - HHS Appointment

 

FDA Loses its War on Ivermectin: Agrees to Remove All Related Social Media Content and Consumer Advisories on Ivermectin Usage for COVID-19.
(IT’S TOO DAMN LATE … HOW MANY PEOPLE DID THE FDA KILL … KNOWINGLY, AS IVERMECTIN HAS BEEN USED FOR DECADES TO PREVENT AND TREAT HUMAN ILLNESSES? THEY ARE CULPABLE IN THE SERIOUS ILLNESS AND DEATHS OF THOUSANDS.)

In December 2021, the FDA warned Americans not to use Ivermectin, which “is intended for animals” to treat or prevent COVID-19.
“Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous,” FDA said at the time.
This was a very controversial statement at the time since the FDA pushed the drug on African migrants back in 2015, and the drug was praised in several scientific journals.
There have now been 101 Ivermectin COVID-19 controlled studies that show a 62% lower risk in early treatment in COVID-19 patients.
A group of brave doctors had filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the agencies’ unlawful attempts to block the use of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Southern District of Texas in Galveston, argues that the FDA has overstepped its authority and unjustifiably interfered with their medical practice.

 

The plaintiffs, Drs. Mary Talley Bowden, Paul E. Marik, and Robert L. Apter, are contesting the FDA’s portrayal of ivermectin as dangerous for human consumption. They note that the FDA has approved ivermectin for human use since 1996 for a variety of diseases. However, they allege that with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA began releasing documents and social media posts discouraging the use of the anti-viral drug for COVID-19 treatment.
“We’re suing the FDA for lying to the public about ivermectin,” said Dr. Bowden.
Claims were made that the initial article misrepresented the law by stating the FDA’s official stance against Ivermectin use without mentioning that doctors were allowed to administer the medicine.
U.S. law is cited in the complaint, including the provision that the FDA “may not interfere with the authority of a health care provider to prescribe or administer any legally marked device to a patient for any condition or disease within a legitimate health care practitioner-patient relationship.”
On Thursday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reportedly agreed to remove all its previous social media posts and consumer advisories that specifically addressed the use of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19.
“FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history. This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship,” Dr. Bowden wrote on her social media.
The plaintiffs have recently received the signed court order and are preparing to issue a press release about it later today.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported that during a hearing, the agency’s lawyers argued that the FDA was only giving advice and it was not mandatory when it told people to “stop” taking Ivermectin for COVID-19.
“The cited statements were not directives,” said Isaac Belfer, one of the lawyers. “They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do. They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19. They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it’s prohibited or it’s unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin.”
“They use informal language, that is true… It’s conversational but not mandatory,” he continued.
However, the statement from the lawyer contradicted the FDA’s social media post, stating, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” and another tweet says, “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”
Both tweets displayed the title of “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19” and included a link to that publication.
Last year, Doctors Mary Talley Bowden, Paul Marik, & Robert Apter appeared in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals as part of their lawsuit.
“The FDA is not your doctor. Yesterday we took them to court to remind them of that,” Dr. Bowden wrote.
“A pharmacist cites CDC and US FDA as why she will continue to deny filling prescriptions for ivermectin. On Tuesday, the FDA’s attorney declared the FDA has no problem with doctors prescribing ivermectin off-label. It’s time for them to make a formal announcement and set the record straight,” Bowden wrote on Thursday.
During the oral argument, Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA stated that the agency “explicitly recognizes” that doctors do have the authority to administer ivermectin to treat COVID.
“”FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID,” said Honold.
“FDA made these statements in response to multiple reports of consumers being hospitalized, after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for horses, which is available for purchase over the counter without the need for prescription,” Honold said.
“In some contexts, those words could be construed as a command,” Ms. Honold said. “But in this context, where FDA was simply using these words in the context of a quippy tweet meant to share its informational article, those statements do not rise to the level of a command.”
“FDA is clearly acknowledging that doctors have the authority to prescribe human ivermectin to treat COVID. So they are not interfering with the authority of doctors to prescribe drugs or to practice medicine,” she said.
It can be recalled that Houston Methodist launched an investigation into Bowden and suspended her for defying health authorities and exercising free speech.
The hospital excoriated Bowden for “using her social media accounts to express her personal opinions about the COVID-19 vaccine and treatments,” NBC News reports. The suspension barred the physician from admitting or treating patients at the hospital.
Bowden repeatedly warned that it is “wrong” to mandate the experimental mRNA vaccines and continuously touted Ivermectin as a safe and effective treatment amid threats from public health officials against prescribing the drug.
Bowden was forced to resign. In her resignation letter, Bowden doubled down on the efficacy of Ivermectin.
“I have worked hard to provide early treatment for victims of COVID-19. My efforts have been successful. I have treated more than 200 COVID-19 patients, including many with co-morbidities, and none of these patients have required hospitalization. This is a testament to the success of my treatment methods,” she wrote. “Throughout this pandemic, there has been no FDA-approved treatment for COVID. Therefore I have done my best to care for patients and save lives in the absence of a clear scientific consensus.”
“Early treatment must still be part of any strategy for patient care. That is why physicians and hospitals should pay more attention to medications such as Ivermectin, which significant research and my clinical experience indicate is effective,” she continued. “I have decided to part ways with Houston Methodist because of the accusation that I have been spreading “dangerous information.” This is false and defamatory. I do not spread misinformation, and my opinions are supported by science. There is substantial evidence for the efficacy of Ivermectin in treating COVID-19, and no evidence for serious or fatal side effects associated with the doses used to treat COVID-19.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/fda-loses-its-war-ivermectin-agrees-remove-all/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=fda-loses-its-war-ivermectin-agrees-remove-all