Iryna Zarutska - The Media Is Trying To Erase Her Murder

Obviously, White girls, or White people as a whole, don't deserve the outrage and concern that blacks and illegals are overwhelmed with when we get harassed, beaten, raped, tortured, or murdered. 

 

https://x.com/Rightanglenews/status/1965144818629366014

 

To EVER Trust Mark Motherzucker Is Insanity

I will never take his word on anything. He lied and deceived and also cowered to the pressure from a communist administration. He would do it again in a heartbeat.

Watch the Veritas video:

https://x.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1877808770941636796

MSNBC Propagandist Joy Reid Is Taking This Particularly Hard

The loss of the Thought Police Stormtroopers is devastating to those who worship the Democrats control over “THE Truth.”

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1876807350079623305?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1876807350079623305%7Ctwgr%5E743fce00b8e2f8ca26a0279d6574b9913968d600%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmoonbattery.com%2F

Motherzuckers motivation is ‘allegedly’ to allow the free exchange of ideas.
Liberals know that their ideology cannot withstand open and honest debate. That’s why they rely on bullying tactics and censorship.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAhahahahaha……..omg……. Hahahahafuckyouhahahaha

Facebook Fact-Checkers freak out. Call emergency meeting after Zuckerberg pulls funding.
(Disclaimer: I don’t believe anything Motherzucker says so I’m convinced this is bullshit liberal political posturing, but it's hilarious to see the "fact-checkers" get triggered.)
Far-Left fact-checking outfits are in full-blown panic mode after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced on Tuesday that Facebook will drop its current fact-checking system, thereby cutting off funding for the partisan organizations.
The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), which includes signatories like PolitiFact and MediaWise, called an emergency meeting “specifically” over Zuckerberg’s announcement, a Business Insider report revealed.
“This program has been a major part of the global fact-checking community’s work for years,” IFCN’s director Angie Holan said. “People are upset because they saw themselves as partners in good standing with Meta, doing important work to make the platform more accurate and reliable.”
One PolitiFact employee said they “found out this morning at the same time as everyone else” about Zuckerberg dropping the partnership.
Zuckerberg said in a video posted Tuesday that Meta will no longer work with third-party fact-checkers, will end restrictions on topics like gender and immigration, and scale back filters that censored people for innocuous posts. The CEO added that Meta would focus on ensuring free expression, saying that the recent election seemed like a “cultural tipping point.”

 

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/facebook-fact-checkers-freak-out-call-emergency-meeting-after-zuckerberg-pulls-funding?topStoryPosition=4

If Kamala Wins, Free Speech Will Soon Be Regulated

A social media platform that does not limit speech to what the Democratic Party wants people to hear will not be permitted under a Harris/Walz administration.

You’ve probably heard some of the censorship speech on this video clip but you probably haven’t heard it all and when it all gets put together like this, it should make you very nervous about the future if Kamala Harris gets into the White House and starts using the UK model of speech censorship, which she most assuredly will do. You can hear it in her own words, especially in the second clip.
The UK has succumbed to authoritarianism and is no longer a free country in any meaningful sense, as the leftists in charge do not honor the fundamental right of free speech. The liberal establishment in the USA has made clear that it wants to follow suit:

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1853303465637818447?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1853303465637818447%7Ctwgr%5Ed5fcc323da1fce5f23536f06aefdacf3eedfb2a8%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmoonbattery.com%2Ffree-speech-is-on-the-ballot%2F

Two steps must be taken before Democrats can inflict their full agenda. They must disarm us, and they must suppress “misinformation/disinformation” — i.e., information that contradicts the Party.
The reason the first two amendments to the US Constitution come before the others is they are the most crucial for defending America from the sort of tyranny that will tighten around our necks like a garrote if Kamala Harris supporters prevail today.

This video has been sped up so as not to be so vomit inducing:

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1853115820940927429?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1853115820940927429%7Ctwgr%5E083a2606b3113cd7ea285e3f42522f2ea0b4025e%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmoonbattery.com%2F

Even A Blind TDS Hog Finds A Nut From Time To Time

Hillary Clinton Lets the Cat Out of Bag On Democrats/Socialists And Controlling Speech

One of the things that Elon Musk just warned about at former President Donald Trump's rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, was the danger that the Democrats posed to free speech and how important it was to vote for Trump to preserve our Constitutional rights.
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton let the cat out of the bag during an interview with CNN on Saturday, where she spoke about the need to control social media. She said it should be "at the top" of every legislative agenda:

https://x.com/dom_lucre/status/1842643445015347571?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1842643445015347571%7Ctwgr%5E8a2f8d28647b9f586ccfa1838d866111f0425d0e%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fnick-arama%2F2024%2F10%2F05%2Fhillary-says-quiet-part-out-loud-n2180195

“We should be, in my view, repealing something called section 230, which gave platforms on the internet immunity because they were thought to be just pass-throughs, that they shouldn’t be judged for the content that is posted. But we now know that that was an overly simple view. That the platforms, whether it’s Facebook or Twitter or X or Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are, if they don’t moderate and monitor the content we lose total control and it’s not just the social and psychological effects, it’s real harm.”
"We lose total control." That's the real problem to them right there, that's why Democrats are so upset. Yes, that's the point of the First Amendment -- the government is not supposed to be in "control" of the speech of the people. Sounds pretty fascistic to me.
People can now see and hear the truth without having it be filtered through liberal media organs. We can now know when the media is lying to us. We may all have -- gasp -- freedom of thought and not agree with the liberal media narrative that is being pushed at us constantly. We can now see reality. When we see reality, we can see what the Democrats really are about. And it should frighten all of us.
The current Democratic candidates for president and VP have showed they have the same kinds of thoughts as Hillary Clinton.

https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1836433328875905081?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1836433328875905081%7Ctwgr%5E8a2f8d28647b9f586ccfa1838d866111f0425d0e%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fnick-arama%2F2024%2F10%2F05%2Fhillary-says-quiet-part-out-loud-n2180195

The First Amendment was specifically created to protect incendiary speech, speech people may not have liked or might find wrong. That’s the very purpose of the Amendment.
Here's George Washington law professor Jonathan Turley talking about how these are dangerous times for free speech with these thoughts.

https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1842615904926077417?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1842615904926077417%7Ctwgr%5E8a2f8d28647b9f586ccfa1838d866111f0425d0e%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fnick-arama%2F2024%2F10%2F05%2Fhillary-says-quiet-part-out-loud-n2180195

Governor Walz has been out there saying that misinformation and hate speech are not protected under the Constitution. And there's a crushing irony there. I mean, in calling for the censorship of other citizens accused of disinformation, the governor is spreading disinformation. He's been told repeatedly by many of us that he's wrong, that that's just completely and demonstrably wrong. The Constitution does protect those forms of speech."
That's also incredibly ironic for someone like Clinton as well, who was a purveyor of misinformation.
Turley also called out Hillary Clinton for pushing censorship.
But the disturbing CNN comment on Saturday from Hillary Clinton is actually a good sign, on a couple of levels.
She's revealing where they want to go, so we can fight it. And she's doing it because it means they know they are losing control. And that's why we must defeat them.

Their Ultimate Plan Is To Shut You Up

And every once in a while one of the dopier ones accidentally says it out loud.

https://x.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1840937093020688774

It hurts to hear the truth … so TikTok just removes it.

This man understands the difference between voting for Trump or 'Komrade Cackler'

https://x.com/shaneyyricch/status/1835081757823320523

The Corrupt Media Are Rabid Democrat Stenographers

The American media were not always utterly biased. Decades ago, most reporters aimed for objectivity. Unfortunately, in the last fifty years, the media have increasingly become tools of the Democrat Party.
In the early 1970’s, the mainstream media worked feverishly to destroy President Richard Nixon and succeeded in forcing him to resign. In the 1980’s, President Ronald Reagan was the subject of constant media harassment. The media seized upon the Iran-Contra story and turned it into another scandal like Watergate. Reagan survived the witch hunt, but it took a toll on his approval ratings, at least in the short term.
While Nixon and Reagan received horrific media treatment, Democrat Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were treated much differently. During the Monica Lewinsky scandal and the investigation that resulted in his impeachment, Clinton was portrayed as the victim by the media. It was independent counsel Ken Starr and congressional Republican investigators who were the real culprits, according to the media, which covered the story as nothing more than a “sex” scandal.
Throughout his presidency, the media were cheerleaders for Barack Obama and viewed him as a “historic” figure. The controversies during his tenure, such as the “Fast and Furious” gun running operation, the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of Tea Party groups and the Benghazi terrorist attack that resulted in the death of United States Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, never received the type of intense media scrutiny that was appropriate. Obama glided through all the controversies without much of an impact on his popularity.
In contrast, when Donald Trump descended the golden escalator and entered the presidential race, the media found a new enemy to attack. Since that time, it has been a relentless assault on President Trump that has never ended.
The media trumpeted the Access Hollywood story, the Russian collusion narrative, and the phony Steele dossier. The Mueller investigation was breathlessly covered and when that failed, the first Trump impeachment investigation was launched with tremendous media excitement.
Trump’s actions during the pandemic, the George Floyd riots, the election controversies, and the January 6th protests were all negatively portrayed by the media. As he has been abused by the lawfare of the Biden administration and local Democrat prosecutors, the mainstream media have supported those bringing the charges against Trump.

 
With the 2024 presidential race in the homestretch, there is no doubt where the mainstream news media stands. For a four-week period starting July 17, The Media Research Center reviewed the evening news programs of the broadcast networks (ABC, CBS & NBC).
Not surprisingly, these news programs gave Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democrat Party’s presidential nominee, 84% positive coverage. In contrast, President Trump received an astounding 89% negative coverage. Not only was the coverage of Harris move positive, but she also received 66% more airtime than Trump received.
The same type of bias extended to the Vice-Presidential candidates. Republican U.S. Senator J.D. Vance suffered through 92% negative coverage, while left-wing Democrat Governor of Minnesota Tim Walz benefitted from 62% positive coverage. Thus, these networks are more interested in covering Vance’s “cat ladies” comment than reporting on legitimate claims that Walz engaged in stolen valor.
Obviously, there is no objectivity from these journalists and the same type of one-sided coverage is provided by CNN, MSNBC, NPR, major newspapers, news magazines, and most of the political websites, such as Politico.
Along with discriminating against President Trump, the broadcast networks totally ignored independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. While these news programs showered 221 minutes of coverage on Harris during this four-week period, Kennedy was relegated  to receiving only 4 minutes of coverage or 2% of the total given to Harris.
When Kennedy exited the race on Friday and endorsed President Trump, he gave a memorable speech. It included a rigorous lambasting of the news media for their dereliction of duty.
He said, “Over the course of more than a year and a campaign where my poll numbers have reached at times in the high twenties, the DNC aligned-mainstream media networks maintain a near-perfect embargo on interviews with me.”
Kennedy noted that in 1992 independent presidential candidate Ross Perot was given much more mainstream media coverage. Instead, Kennedy received very few interviews and whatever coverage he was given was almost always negative.
He blamed President Joe Biden for forcing “media companies to censor political speech.” In Kennedy’s view, these actions are “an attack on our most sacred right of free expression, and that’s the very right upon which all of our other constitutional rights rest.”
In his speech, Kennedy asked reporters “to consider the many ways that your institutions have abdicated this really sacred responsibility, the duty of a free press to safeguard democracy and to challenge, always, the party in power.”
Sadly, few reporters will respond to Kennedy’s challenge. They are happy to cover for the inept Kamala Harris and justify her decision not to give interviews or conduct news conferences. These reporters will attempt to blur her far-left record and focus on her appeal to “joy” and “good vibes.’
Kennedy referred to the transition of the American media from “maintaining that posture of fierce skepticism of authority” and being a “guardian of the First Amendment and democratic principles” into becoming “government mouthpieces and stenographers for the organs of power” and joining “this systemic attack on democracy.”
The media have regressed from government watchdogs into government lapdogs, akin to Pravda during the height of the Soviet Union.
Our media try to destroy President Trump and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. because they are threats to the status quo. Conversely, the media are cheerleaders for this administration and the Democrat Party and censor political opposition.
As Kennedy eloquently said, “The media justifies their censorship on the grounds of combating misinformation, but governments and oppressors don’t censor lies. They don’t fear lies. They fear the truth, and that’s what they censor.”
In America, truth is a rare commodity, thanks to our corrupt media.

https://thelibertydaily.com/corrupt-media-are-rabid-democrat-stenographers/