Commie Rep. Jamie Raskin wants to deny Trump Presidency using 14th Amendment and prepare for ‘Civil War Conditions’.

https://x.com/merissahansen17/status/1820501337383244286?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1820501337383244286%7Ctwgr%5E77d419d5d9b43d38ddb5282b1a464356ea9bd9cd%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fbustednuckles.com%2F

This is what these delusional c*cksuckers keep trying to use to circumvent a legitimate electoral win if Trump wins in November.

Fourteenth Amendment: Equal Protection and Other Rights
• Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Contrary to what these Commie F*cks keep telling themselves, Trump has never been convicted of insurrection, for a damn good reason.
They keep dropping the end of the message that he actually said on January 6th and trying to jam a selectively edited version down everyone’s throat while pretending it’s concrete evidence that Trump is guilty of fomenting an insurrection.
Here is what he actually said,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UILCtm_ALMI

“To peacefully and patriotically make your voice heard.”
Nowhere did he mention violence.
Somehow the DemonRats are physically unable to hear those words and claim he incited a riot.
So now this Raskin asshole says out loud that if Trump wins the election that the Demonrats are going to intentionally set up the conditions for Civil War.
Notice right after he says this the very next thing out of his mouth is saying they (The politicians) are going to need more body guards.
Personally … sadly, I don’t think that Republicans have a chance of winning the next Presidential election, after all:

“We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.” - Joe Biden

 Rep. Pramila Jayapal: Trump "Incited an Erection"

“… and it was YUGE ... it was this big.”

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ea3cKQqNQg

 Elise Stefanik Gives Master Class On Refuting Democrats’ ‘Insurrection’ Lies.
In an NBC interview Sunday, Rep. Elise Stefanik deftly demonstrated how to handle Democrats’ false claims about a Jan. 6, 2021 “insurrection” to justify criminalizing the speech of the half of the country that opposes their policies.

At the beginning of “Meet the Press” host Kristen Welker’s interview with Stefanik, Welker played a deceptively edited clip from Jan. 6, 2021. On the House floor, Stefanik characterized the events from earlier that day as “tragic” and stated that violent individuals should be “prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”
Had NBC honestly portrayed the clip, it would have included the main point of Stefanik’s speech. That was to call out Democrats for dismantling election integrity laws ahead of the 2020 election in key swing states. Watch Stefanik’s remarks in full here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CG5aOiPv7cY
 
Welker asked the dark-horse potential for Donald Trump’s vice presidential pick whether she still believes “that day was tragic, and that those who were responsible should be held responsible to the fullest extent of the law.” This was an attempt to entrap Stefanik into accepting the Democrat lie that Jan. 6 amounted to an “insurrection” that justifies the Biden Department of Justice’s continued investigation and prosecution of nonviolent attendees at the protest.
Stefanik refused to take the bait, responding, “Well, first of all, Kristen, as typical for NBC and the biased media, you played one excerpt of my speech… If you go back and play the full speech I gave on the House floor, I condemned the violence just like I condemn the violence of the BLM [Black Lives Matter] riots. But I also importantly stood for election integrity and security of our elections. If we don’t have that, we do not have a democracy.”
Stefanik also expressed “concerns about the treatment of January 6 hostages,” and the “weaponization of the federal government against not just President Trump, but [all] conservatives.”
Indeed, countless peaceful protesters who demonstrated at the capitol three years ago have been slandered by the media and House Democrats’ J6 Committee, harassed by Biden’s Department of Justice, and held for months in solitary confinement awaiting trial. Traditional Catholics, pro-lifers, parents who oppose critical race theory at school board meetings, and Trump supporters have also found themselves targets of the Biden DOJ for exercising their First Amendment right to free speech and assembly.
“And that’s one of the reasons why I’m so proud to serve on the Select Committee on the Weaponization of the [Federal] Government,” said Stefanik. “Because the American people want answers. They want transparency, and they understand that as you look across this country, there seem to be two sets of rules. If your last name is Clinton, or it’s Biden, you get to live by a different set of rules than if you’re an everyday patriotic American.”
“So the real threat to our democracy is these baseless witch hunt investigations and lawsuits against President Trump,” Stefanik added. “[It] is undemocratic and it’s shredding our Constitution, and you know who agrees with me, Kristen? The American people. That’s why President Trump is winning in poll after poll against Joe Biden.”
Welker also asked Stefanik if she would “vote to certify the results of the ’24 election no matter what they show?” Again, refusing to fall into Welker’s trap, Stefanik replied matter of factly, “We will see if this is a legal and valid election.”
This answer has been seized on by the corporate media to somehow insinuate that Stefanik is anti-democratic. Apparently, Welker and the rest of her media peers do not comprehend the point of certifying the presidential election, which is to validate the integrity of the electoral process. In other words, no representative should be committed to certifying or not certifying the election until after it has taken place and been verifiably conducted lawfully.
Importantly, Stefanik pointed out the key fact that Democrats are already interfering in the 2024 election through multiple means. “What we’re seeing so far is that Democrats are so desperate they’re trying to remove President Trump from the ballot,” Stefanik continued. “That is a suppression of the American people.”

https://thefederalist.com/2024/01/08/elise-stefanik-gives-master-class-on-refuting-democrats-insurrection-lies/

 BREAKING NEWS Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump is DISQUALIFIED from running for president and removed from the state ballot under the 14th Amendment for 'engaging in an insurrection.’

The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday removed former President Donald Trump from the state's 2024 Republican primary ballot, ruling he violated the insurrectionist clause of the 14th Amendment for his role in January 6.
In a 4-3 decision, Colorado's high court ruled the ex-president and 2024 hopeful isn't eligible for the presidency.
The 14th Amendment was approved after the Civil War and bars officials from seeking future office should they have 'engaged in insurrection.'
'A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,' the court wrote.
The decision may not stick - with Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung confirming Tuesday evening that the ex-president would appeal it to the Supreme Court. 

 

 

'We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these unAmerican lawsuits,' Cheung said.
The decision comes after a district court ruled that while Trump incited an insurrection - the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack - the provision in the Constitution was unclear whether it was intended to bar candidates for the presidency.
Tuesday's ruling will be placed on hold pending an appeal until January 4.

The lawsuit was filed by the Washington, D.C.-based group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, on behalf of six Colorado voters, some Republican and some unaffiliated with a political party.
The lawsuit pointed to Trump's role in the January 6 Capitol attack and also his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
The court found 'by clear and convincing evidence' that Trump engaged in an insurrection as defined by the Fourteenth Amendment.
The court found the section to be ‘self-executing,’ meaning further action by Congress was not required.
It found the District Court ‘did not err’ when it determined that January 6 constituted an ‘insurrection.’
It did so by citing Trump’s January 6 speech, where he told a crowd on the Ellipse to ‘fight like hell,’ saying it was not protected speech under the First Amendment.
‘The sum of these parts is this: President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three; because he is disqualified, it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Secretary to list him as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot,’ the court ruled.
It acknowledged the certain appeal, staying the decision until January 4 to allow for time.
And it included the caveat: ‘We are also cognizant that we travel in uncharted territory, and that this case presents several issues of first impression,’ among others.
Cheung said the decision was a product of an 'all-Democrat appointed' court and a 'Soros-funded, left-wing group’s scheme to interfere in an election on behalf of Crooked Joe Biden.'
'Democrat Party leaders are in a state of paranoia over the growing, dominant lead President Trump has amassed in the polls. They have lost faith in the failed Biden presidency and are now doing everything they can to stop the American voters from throwing them out of office next November,' Cheung said in a statement.
CREW's president and the plaintiffs cheered Tuesday's decision.
'The court's decision today affirms what our clients alleged in this lawsuit: that Donald Trump is an insurrectionist who disqualified himself from office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment based on his role in the January 6th attack on the Capitol, and that Secretary Griswold must keep him off of Colorado's primary ballot. It is not only historic and justified, but is necessary to protect the future of democracy in our country,' said CREW President Noah Bookbinder in a statement.
'Our Constitution clearly states that those who violate their oath by attacking our democracy are barred from serving in government. It has been an honor to represent the petitioners, and we look forward to ensuring that this vitally important ruling stands,' Bookbinder added.
One of the plaintiffs, Norma Anderson, was the former Republican Colorado House and Senate leader.
'My fellow plaintiffs and I brought this case to continue to protect the right to free and fair elections enshrined in our Constitution and to ensure Colorado Republican primary voters are only voting for eligible candidates. Today's win does just that,' she said in a statement.
'Long before this lawsuit was filed, I had already read Section 3 of the 14th Amendment and concluded that it applied to Donald Trump, given his actions leading up to and on January 6th. I am proud to be a petitioner, and gratified that the Colorado Supreme Court arrived at the same conclusion we all did,' she added.
 Also piling on was Eric Trump, who made reference to how Trump's poll numbers have jumped even while he faces four criminal prosecutions.
'Prediction: This Colorado decision will add 5%+ points to @realDonaldTrump already runaway polls,' he posted on X.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12883351/Colorado-Supreme-Court-rules-Trump-DISQUALIFIED-president.html

 Another one of the J6'ers that will hopefully get justice one day, but that would take getting a Republican, CONSTITUTIONAL President elected again ... I don't see that happening because of voter fraud.

J6 - Insurrection/FBI Hoax