ANALYSIS: Trans activists tell straight, gay people they can’t have ‘genital preferences.’ *

A recent Twitter trend has reignited a debate within the LGBTQ community. The debate involves the lesbian and gay members who are resisting the tendency of queer theory–an ideology advanced in higher education–to present conflicting, even regressive messages about the ability to find love in same-sex relationships.
“[I]n the last week,” one Twitter user writes, “I have seen a huge surge of ‘I am now anti-trans because someone told me I wasn’t allowed to have genital preferences.’”
The subject of “genital preferences” is the latest debate in the LGBTQ community, with some tweeting that it is “transphobic” when a cisgender person does not want to date or is not attracted to a transgender man or woman.
Others, however, argue that activists looking to abolish genital preferences–the desire to date someone with specific genitalia– are “simply an echo of the ‘choosing the gay lifestyle’ rhetoric of the late 70s and 80s.”
The criticism of the latest trend in transgender activism as homophobic has been shared across the Anglosphere, including by journalists in Canada and England and in the pages of Campus Reform.
EJ Rosetta, a London-based writer featured in outlets including HuffPost, told Campus Reform, “I cannot choose my sexuality nor change it, opt in or out, and neither can anyone else.”
She described a problem in the transgender community: objectives are often pushed, not by people who are transgender, but by those she calls “Trans Rights Activists” (TRAs). Rosetta, who told Campus Reform that she is “a trans ally” and “[has] been for over a decade,” noted the harm done by TRAs.
“They do not ask, they demand and dictate, and we lesbians wish to be distanced from that,” she says. “We are going backwards!”
Campus Reform Editor-in-Chief Zachary Marschall made a similar argument when he described the fallout from “queer theory,” a set of concepts that, “in trying to always be about everything,” are “precisely about nothing.” These concepts–taught in college courses and advanced by on-campus gender and sexuality centers–attempt to erase biological reality.

(Reading too much of this depravity crapola gives me a headache. I don’t even think these LGBTQ+XYZ freaks understand some of the twisted shit they spew out. Hell, when ‘normal’ gays and lesbians are calling them out on their twisted shit, you know they’ve crossed the deviancy line. Reading it can most likely lower your IQ. When you start to understand it … STOP and walk away.)

There is more alphabet confusing bullshit at the link:

https://www.campusreform.org/article/analysis-trans-activists-tell-straight-gay-people-they-cant-have-genital-preferences-/21484

(*My personal analysis: I am now certain that I can be defined as “transphobic” according to the mentally deranged ideology being pushed by the LGBTQ perverts … ALTHOUGH, I deny that I fit the ‘phobic part of that ideology because I AM NOT AFRAID of transfreaks … ‘phobic means fear, I could be better defined as trans-aware, trans-nauseated, or maybe trans-odious** and maybe go so far as to be trans-misia***.
Maybe a prefix would set me apart … I will accept contra-trans … lol.

**odious means "arousing or meriting strong dislike, aversion, or intense displeasure."
***misia, which would be a Greek-derived suffix meaning "hatred of.”)