Who are we negotiating with? I mean, if we actually do want to negotiate some sort of end to this conflict we will need to stop killing the people we are supposed to be talking to. On the one hand Trump keeps saying that Iran wants to negotiate and also that is they don't agree to opening the Strait of Hormuz we will bomb everything in Iran... and yet we keep killing their leader.
It is very hard to negotiate with dead men. Maybe that is why we can't get them to open the strait.
I'm glad you aren't doing the negotiating. Trump and his advisors have it under control. As far as I'm concerned, when they get down to the point where they're having to stop Iranian citizens on the street and asking them for their opinion, that works for me. The leaders you seem to be concerned about are murderous terroristic bastards and they all need to die. The Strait will open with little to no issues, probably within the next two weeks or so.
You beat me to it. You keep killing the Pisslamist assholes until you get down to the ones who finally realizes that we're not fucking around this time. Enough mullahs and their henchmen assume desert dirt temperature and the regular Persians can take their country back and rejoin the fold of the civilized world. Until then, keep lubing every bomb and bullet with bacon grease and sending them as gifts from the American taxpayers.
I have no problem with the IDF taking out these animals whenever and wherever that find them. But it is not going to have a major impact on this war or its outcome. The regime there has been planning for his war for decades. They have FAR more ordnance and weapons squirreled away in cave and tunnels than anyone in he west imagined. They have organized their forces so they don't need a centralized command structure. And they aren't afraid of death. To them, dying in combat with the infidels guarantees heaven and 72 virgins. It's a problem that may not have a solution. We can kill them but they will never surrender. Nobody knows the future but I have no doubt this adventure will not end as this administration thinks it will. But at least Iran's access to nukes has been delayed for a few years.
Everyone said Japan would never surrender. I saw that the U.N. voted about working on opening the strait, but it was reported that Chy-nah vetoed the plan, because it was too aggressive. We should totally revamp NATO, and tell the U.N. to know who their daddy is. Any NATO member that wants to restrict the use of their airspace or bases/ports, by another member, should face severe financial repercussions.
As someone who has (in the past) had firsthand experience with dealing with Southwest Asian militaries being ruled by authoritarian regimes, they are ALL completely reliant on a centralized command and control structure. By design, autocratic regimes do NOT relinquish ANY control for their troops to act independently, because they just might turn against the regime if not under EXTREMELY tight control. Iran isn't the mountainous, army-eating No Man's Land that is Crapcanistan. Their infrastructure and miltary assets are in relatively accessible areas and, when they're completely wiped out, the regime will have no way to communicate with and control their forces. Without command and control, all of their military assets are, quite literally, sitting ducks. It might take a few weeks, but the clock is rapidly ticking down to zero for the Mad Mullahs. The Persians will be the most grateful nation on the planet when they're free of their chains.
Well, you stepped up to the merry-go-round, stamped the ticket and now you have missed the brass ring. No going around again.
ReplyDeleteThe brass rings are all blown up.
DeleteWho are we negotiating with?
ReplyDeleteI mean, if we actually do want to negotiate some sort of end to this conflict we will need to stop killing the people we are supposed to be talking to.
On the one hand Trump keeps saying that Iran wants to negotiate and also that is they don't agree to opening the Strait of Hormuz we will bomb everything in Iran... and yet we keep killing their leader.
It is very hard to negotiate with dead men. Maybe that is why we can't get them to open the strait.
I'm glad you aren't doing the negotiating.
DeleteTrump and his advisors have it under control.
As far as I'm concerned, when they get down to the point where they're having to stop Iranian citizens on the street and asking them for their opinion, that works for me.
The leaders you seem to be concerned about are murderous terroristic bastards and they all need to die.
The Strait will open with little to no issues, probably within the next two weeks or so.
You beat me to it. You keep killing the Pisslamist assholes until you get down to the ones who finally realizes that we're not fucking around this time. Enough mullahs and their henchmen assume desert dirt temperature and the regular Persians can take their country back and rejoin the fold of the civilized world. Until then, keep lubing every bomb and bullet with bacon grease and sending them as gifts from the American taxpayers.
DeleteI have no problem with the IDF taking out these animals whenever and wherever that find them. But it is not going to have a major impact on this war or its outcome. The regime there has been planning for his war for decades. They have FAR more ordnance and weapons squirreled away in cave and tunnels than anyone in he west imagined. They have organized their forces so they don't need a centralized command structure. And they aren't afraid of death. To them, dying in combat with the infidels guarantees heaven and 72 virgins. It's a problem that may not have a solution. We can kill them but they will never surrender. Nobody knows the future but I have no doubt this adventure will not end as this administration thinks it will. But at least Iran's access to nukes has been delayed for a few years.
ReplyDeleteEveryone said Japan would never surrender.
ReplyDeleteI saw that the U.N. voted about working on opening the strait, but it was reported that Chy-nah vetoed the plan, because it was too aggressive. We should totally revamp NATO, and tell the U.N. to know who their daddy is.
Any NATO member that wants to restrict the use of their airspace or bases/ports, by another member, should face severe financial repercussions.
As someone who has (in the past) had firsthand experience with dealing with Southwest Asian militaries being ruled by authoritarian regimes, they are ALL completely reliant on a centralized command and control structure. By design, autocratic regimes do NOT relinquish ANY control for their troops to act independently, because they just might turn against the regime if not under EXTREMELY tight control. Iran isn't the mountainous, army-eating No Man's Land that is Crapcanistan. Their infrastructure and miltary assets are in relatively accessible areas and, when they're completely wiped out, the regime will have no way to communicate with and control their forces. Without command and control, all of their military assets are, quite literally, sitting ducks. It might take a few weeks, but the clock is rapidly ticking down to zero for the Mad Mullahs. The Persians will be the most grateful nation on the planet when they're free of their chains.
ReplyDeleteHowever it comes out, pretty sure the Iranians-in-the-street will be more grateful longer than the French.
Delete